{"id":2039,"date":"2025-09-02T14:20:13","date_gmt":"2025-09-02T14:20:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/?p=2039"},"modified":"2025-09-02T14:21:36","modified_gmt":"2025-09-02T14:21:36","slug":"the-long-arc-of-indian-diplomacy-from-bandung-to-the-modi-putin-xi-triangle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/2025\/09\/02\/the-long-arc-of-indian-diplomacy-from-bandung-to-the-modi-putin-xi-triangle\/","title":{"rendered":"The Long Arc of Indian Diplomacy: From Bandung to the Modi\u2013Putin\u2013Xi Triangle"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Sanjeev Oak<\/strong><\/p>\n

Every decade tests India\u2019s ability to balance between power blocs. From Nehru\u2019s Bandung Conference to Indira\u2019s Brezhnev axis, from Vajpayee\u2019s Washington\u2013Moscow manoeuvres to today\u2019s Modi\u2013Putin\u2013Xi engagements, the story is one of continuity: India refusing to be dictated, preferring to script its own terms of engagement.<\/p>\n

At the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit, the warm embrace between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Russian President Vladimir Putin, under the watchful eyes of Xi Jinping, generated headlines far beyond the Eurasian stage. For India, it was more than just optics. For Washington, it was a reminder that India remains steadfast in its pursuit of strategic autonomy<\/em>, even in an age of bloc politics.<\/p>\n

Predictably, the chorus of criticism from the West followed. The sharpest came from Peter Navarro, a Trump-era trade adviser, who dismissed the Modi\u2013Putin meeting as \u201ctroublesome.\u201d His framing was familiar \u2014 implying India should behave like an adjunct of U.S. policy rather than as a sovereign state with a long arc of independent diplomacy.<\/p>\n

But history tells a different story. India has never been a camp follower. It has always been a camp-builder.<\/p>\n

Bandung and the Birth of Non-Alignment<\/h3>\n

The roots go back to 1955, when Jawaharlal Nehru joined Sukarno, Nasser, Tito, and Zhou Enlai at Bandung in Indonesia. That conference gave shape to the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), India\u2019s first grand articulation of being neither Washington\u2019s outpost nor Moscow\u2019s proxy.<\/p>\n

Nehru saw non-alignment not as passivity but as agency. In the thick of the Cold War, when the world was neatly divided into NATO and Warsaw Pact, India insisted on retaining manoeuvrability. The West derided it as fence-sitting; the Soviets called it na\u00efve. Yet NAM gave the newly decolonised world a voice, ensuring that Afro-Asian nations were not reduced to pawns in superpower rivalry.<\/p>\n

\u201cIndia has never been a camp follower. It has always been a camp-builder.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

That spirit survives today in India\u2019s engagements with Russia and China. The SCO may not be NAM, but the instinct behind India\u2019s participation \u2014 creating options, not submitting to alignments \u2014 remains remarkably consistent.<\/p>\n

Indira Gandhi and the Brezhnev Axis<\/h3>\n

Critics often argue that India\u2019s non-alignment collapsed under Indira Gandhi, particularly after the 1971 Indo-Soviet Treaty of Peace, Friendship, and Cooperation. But the context matters. Faced with Nixon and Kissinger\u2019s infamous \u201ctilt\u201d towards Pakistan during the Bangladesh Liberation War, Indira used Moscow\u2019s embrace as strategic insurance.<\/p>\n

The Indira\u2013Brezhnev axis was not about dependence; it was about survival in a hostile international climate. It allowed India to checkmate both Washington and Beijing in South Asia, while simultaneously pressing forward with economic and military consolidation.<\/p>\n

Just as Indira leveraged Moscow without surrendering sovereignty, Modi leverages partnerships today. His ability to maintain defence cooperation with Russia, deepen energy ties, and simultaneously negotiate pacts with the U.S. mirrors Indira\u2019s balancing act.<\/p>\n

Vajpayee\u2019s Balancing Between Bush and Moscow<\/h3>\n

Fast forward to Atal Bihari Vajpayee. His tenure saw India conduct nuclear tests in 1998, prompting U.S. sanctions. Yet within a few years, Vajpayee had turned relations around, building the foundation for the India\u2013U.S. strategic partnership with George W. Bush.<\/p>\n

At the same time, Vajpayee did not abandon Moscow. The 2000 \u201cStrategic Partnership\u201d with Russia ensured that India\u2019s defence and energy interests remained anchored. His genius lay in not treating U.S. and Russia as mutually exclusive.<\/p>\n

\u201cFrom Bandung to Bush, the Indian instinct has been clear: options, not obedience.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

Modi\u2019s diplomacy fits in this continuum. Just as Vajpayee balanced Washington and Moscow, Modi today balances the U.S., Russia, and China \u2014 a far more complex triangle, but one navigated with the same doctrine of autonomy.<\/p>\n

Modi\u2013Putin\u2013Xi: A 21st-Century Triangle<\/h3>\n

Today, the global order is fractured: U.S.\u2013China rivalry intensifies, Russia has turned East after its Ukraine war isolation, and the Global South is reasserting itself. In this context, Modi\u2019s ability to engage Putin warmly while keeping channels open with Xi \u2014 and still expanding ties with Biden\u2019s America \u2014 is not duplicity. It is diplomatic dexterity.<\/p>\n

India knows that Russia remains crucial for defence supplies, energy security, and Eurasian access. China is a rival, but also a trade partner whose containment cannot be outsourced to Washington. The U.S. is a partner of choice, but not a commander of India\u2019s foreign policy.<\/p>\n

The Modi\u2013Putin\u2013Xi triangle signals not submission to Eurasia, but assertion of India\u2019s role as a swing power.<\/p>\n

Why Washington Bristles<\/h3>\n

Navarro\u2019s critique must be seen in light of Washington\u2019s discomfort. The U.S. has long assumed that \u201cshared values\u201d and \u201cshared interests\u201d would lock India into the Western camp. But India has always made clear: convergence does not mean subservience.<\/p>\n

When Nehru refused to send troops to the Korean War, Washington fumed. When Indira signed the 1971 treaty with Moscow, Nixon raged. When Vajpayee tested nukes, Clinton sanctioned. Yet each time, India survived \u2014 and eventually compelled Washington to engage on India\u2019s terms.<\/p>\n

Today, when Modi embraces Putin, Washington sees echoes of that history. The irritation is less about Russia, more about the refusal of India to be predictable in the Western script.<\/p>\n

\u201cConvergence does not mean subservience. That is the Indian lesson Washington forgets.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Global South Dimension<\/h3>\n

There is another layer. India\u2019s Eurasian outreach resonates with the Global South\u2019s mood. Just as Bandung once rallied postcolonial nations, forums like BRICS and SCO today reflect a search for alternatives to Western-dominated financial and security structures.<\/p>\n

India may not fully endorse the China\u2013Russia agenda within these blocs, but its presence ensures balance. Much like NAM, where India was the moderating voice between radicals and conservatives, today too it acts as the stabiliser in BRICS and SCO.<\/p>\n

The Long Arc<\/h3>\n

Put together, the trajectory is clear:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • Bandung (1955):<\/strong> Non-alignment as voice of the decolonised.<\/li>\n
  • Indira\u2013Brezhnev (1971):<\/strong> Tactical alignment to safeguard sovereignty.<\/li>\n
  • Vajpayee\u2013Bush (2000s):<\/strong> Simultaneous engagement with U.S. and Russia.<\/li>\n
  • Modi\u2013Putin\u2013Xi (2025):<\/strong> Multi-vector diplomacy in a fragmented order.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    Each phase was derided at the time. Each later vindicated.<\/p>\n

    Continuity, Not Contradiction<\/h3>\n

    To see Modi\u2019s handshake with Putin as \u201ctroublesome,\u201d as Navarro does, is to miss the thread that runs through seven decades of Indian diplomacy. This is not an aberration; it is a continuation.<\/p>\n

    From Nehru to Modi, India\u2019s instinct has been the same: resist external pressures, build multiple options, and assert independence in a world of blocs.<\/p>\n

    \u201cThe handshake at SCO was not the betrayal of an ally. It was the reaffirmation of a tradition.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Washington may bristle. Beijing may calculate. Moscow may celebrate. But India\u2019s approach remains steady: engage all, align with none, and remain the author of its own destiny.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Every decade tests India\u2019s ability to balance between power blocs. From Nehru\u2019s Bandung Conference to Indira\u2019s Brezhnev axis, from Vajpayee\u2019s Washington\u2013Moscow manoeuvres to today\u2019s Modi\u2013Putin\u2013Xi engagements, the story is one of continuity: India refusing to be dictated, preferring to script its own terms of engagement.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2040,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_container_layout":"default_layout","colormag_page_sidebar_layout":"default_layout","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39],"tags":[43,47,55,37],"class_list":["post-2039","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-geo-politics","tag-bharat","tag-china","tag-russia","tag-usa"],"magazineBlocksPostFeaturedMedia":{"thumbnail":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1","medium":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?fit=225%2C300&ssl=1","medium_large":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?fit=768%2C1024&ssl=1","large":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?fit=768%2C1024&ssl=1","1536x1536":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?fit=1152%2C1536&ssl=1","2048x2048":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?fit=1200%2C1600&ssl=1","colormag-highlighted-post":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?resize=392%2C272&ssl=1","colormag-featured-post-medium":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?resize=390%2C205&ssl=1","colormag-featured-post-small":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?resize=130%2C90&ssl=1","colormag-featured-image":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?resize=800%2C445&ssl=1","colormag-default-news":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1","colormag-featured-image-large":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?resize=1200%2C600&ssl=1","colormag-elementor-block-extra-large-thumbnail":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?resize=1155%2C480&ssl=1","colormag-elementor-grid-large-thumbnail":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?resize=600%2C417&ssl=1","colormag-elementor-grid-small-thumbnail":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?resize=285%2C450&ssl=1","colormag-elementor-grid-medium-large-thumbnail":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?resize=575%2C198&ssl=1","sow-carousel-default":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?resize=272%2C182&ssl=1","sow-post-carousel-overlay-theme":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?resize=360%2C476&ssl=1","sow-post-carousel-cards-theme":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?resize=360%2C240&ssl=1","sow-blog-portfolio":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?resize=375%2C375&ssl=1","sow-blog-grid":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?resize=720%2C480&ssl=1","sow-blog-alternate":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?resize=950%2C630&ssl=1"},"magazineBlocksPostAuthor":{"name":"admin","avatar":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/907e2ea9c770f6faa637f8ea68c71753beae518b717dc7c49df834cd7acded64?s=96&d=mm&r=g"},"magazineBlocksPostCommentsNumber":"0","magazineBlocksPostExcerpt":"Every decade tests India\u2019s ability to balance between power blocs. From Nehru\u2019s Bandung Conference to Indira\u2019s Brezhnev axis, from Vajpayee\u2019s Washington\u2013Moscow manoeuvres to today\u2019s Modi\u2013Putin\u2013Xi engagements, the story is one of continuity: India refusing to be dictated, preferring to script its own terms of engagement.","magazineBlocksPostCategories":["Geo Politics"],"magazineBlocksPostViewCount":236,"magazineBlocksPostReadTime":6,"magazine_blocks_featured_image_url":{"full":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?fit=1200%2C1600&ssl=1",1200,1600,false],"medium":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?fit=225%2C300&ssl=1",225,300,true],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1",150,150,true]},"magazine_blocks_author":{"display_name":"admin","author_link":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/author\/admin\/"},"magazine_blocks_comment":0,"magazine_blocks_author_image":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/907e2ea9c770f6faa637f8ea68c71753beae518b717dc7c49df834cd7acded64?s=96&d=mm&r=g","magazine_blocks_category":"Geo Politics<\/a>","jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/modi-putin-xi.jpg?fit=1200%2C1600&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2039","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2039"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2039\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2042,"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2039\/revisions\/2042"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2040"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2039"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2039"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2039"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}