{"id":6745,"date":"2026-07-02T05:29:32","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T05:29:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/?p=6745"},"modified":"2026-07-02T05:33:41","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T05:33:41","slug":"trumps-billion-dollar-crypto-empire-power-profit-and-the-ethics-of-the-presidency","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/2026\/07\/02\/trumps-billion-dollar-crypto-empire-power-profit-and-the-ethics-of-the-presidency\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump’s Billion-Dollar Crypto Empire: Power, Profit, and the Ethics of the Presidency"},"content":{"rendered":"

President Trump’s disclosure that his family’s cryptocurrency ventures generated more than$1 billion in a single year has ignited one of the most significant ethical debates in modern American politics. The controversy is not simply about extraordinary wealth. It raises a more fundamental question: Can a President promote an industry while simultaneously profiting from its success without weakening public confidence in democratic governance?<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

By Sanjeev Oak<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"Only a few years ago, Donald Trump dismissed Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as a “scam,” arguing that the US dollar should remain the world’s only trusted currency. Today, that position has undergone a remarkable transformation. Trump has emerged not merely as a supporter of digital assets but as one of the cryptocurrency industry’s most prominent beneficiaries.<\/span><\/p>\n

According to his latest financial disclosure, Trump’s family earned well over $1 billion<\/strong> from cryptocurrency ventures during 2025<\/strong>, placing digital finance at the center of a national debate over presidential ethics. The disclosure has revived an enduring constitutional question: Where should democracy draw the line when political authority and private financial interests converge?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

“The real question is not Trump’s wealth. It is whether presidential power can ever be fully separated from private financial interests.”<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The disclosures identify two primary engines behind Trump’s cryptocurrency fortune.<\/span><\/p>\n

The first is World Liberty Financial (WLF)<\/strong>, a digital asset venture established by Trump’s sons and close business associates. The company reportedly generated between $550 million and $800 million<\/strong> for the Trump family, making it one of the most profitable business enterprises associated with a sitting American president. <\/span>The second pillar is the $TRUMP meme coin<\/strong>, by far the more controversial of the two ventures.<\/span><\/p>\n

Unlike conventional financial assets, meme coins derive much of their value from public enthusiasm, brand recognition, and investor sentiment rather than underlying economic fundamentals. Few political brands possess greater global visibility than Donald Trump. Driven by his enormous public profile and loyal political following, the value of the\u00a0 $TRUMP<\/strong> token surged rapidly after its launch. Analysts estimate that royalties and related transactions linked to the token generated an additional $635 million<\/strong> for Trump. <\/span>Together, these ventures have dramatically reshaped Trump’s financial profile.<\/span><\/p>\n

According to Forbes<\/strong>, his estimated net worth increased from approximately $2.3 billion in 2024<\/strong> to nearly $6.5 billion by 2026<\/strong>. Significantly, much of that growth came not from the real estate empire that first established his reputation, but from cryptocurrency and other blockchain-based assets.<\/span><\/p>\n

For decades, Trump was synonymous with Manhattan skyscrapers, luxury hotels, golf resorts, and high-profile real estate developments. Today, he is equally associated with blockchain technology, meme coins, and decentralized finance. His evolution reflects a broader transformation in the global economy, where digital assets increasingly rival traditional industries as engines of wealth creation.<\/span><\/p>\n

Cryptocurrency is only one component of Trump’s broader business empire. His golf courses and luxury resorts continue to generate substantial revenue, with Mar-a-Lago<\/strong> alone reportedly producing approximately $77 million<\/strong> annually. Additional income has flowed from international licensing agreements, brand partnerships, and legal settlements involving major media companies.<\/span><\/p>\n

Yet none of these traditional businesses has matched the explosive growth of his cryptocurrency holdings. Digital finance has become the principal driver of Trump’s recent wealth accumulation. The disclosures immediately drew criticism from political opponents, ethics scholars, and government watchdogs. Trump, however, has remained unapologetic. <\/span>Asked about the controversy, he defended both his financial success and the broader performance of the American economy.<\/span><\/p>\n

“Everybody’s profiting. The stock market is booming.”<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"Trump maintains that independent managers oversee his investments and that he plays no role in their day-to-day operation. He also argues that he entered public life as an already successful businessman, making suggestions that he has used the presidency for personal enrichment fundamentally unfair.\u00a0<\/span>“I was successful before politics,” has become one of his recurring responses. <\/span>Critics argue that Trump’s personal fortune is not the central issue.<\/span><\/p>\n

The more consequential question is whether a President can pursue policies that directly benefit an industry in which he and his family maintain substantial financial interests. That question has transformed what might otherwise have been another story about presidential wealth into one of the defining governance debates of the digital age.<\/span><\/p>\n

The controversy intensified after Trump’s return to the White House. During the 2024 presidential campaign, he pledged to make the United States the “Crypto Capital of the World.”<\/strong> Once in office, his administration embraced a markedly more favorable approach toward digital finance, signaling regulatory reforms, encouraging blockchain innovation, and promoting policies designed to strengthen the cryptocurrency industry. <\/span>Markets responded swiftly. Investor confidence strengthened, crypto valuations climbed, and blockchain companies welcomed Washington’s policy shift. Critics, however, see a more troubling pattern.<\/span><\/p>\n

They argue that policies designed to stimulate the cryptocurrency industry have simultaneously increased the value of ventures closely associated with the President and his family. Whether this reflects sound economic policy or a profound conflict of interest has become one of the most fiercely contested questions in American public life. The debate therefore extends well beyond cryptocurrency itself. <\/span>It reaches the heart of democratic governance. <\/span>How transparent must political power remain when public policy and private wealth appear to advance together?<\/strong><\/p>\n

President or Crypto Entrepreneur?<\/span><\/h1>\n

\"\"Trump’s cryptocurrency fortune has generated more than political controversy. It has revived one of the oldest constitutional questions in American public life: How should a President separate public office from private financial interests?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The US Constitution does not require a President to divest personal assets before taking office. Historically, however, presidents have sought to avoid even the appearance of conflicts of interest by placing investments in blind trusts or distancing themselves from the daily management of their businesses. The objective has never been limited to legal compliance. It has been to preserve confidence that government decisions are made exclusively in the national interest. That principle now faces one of its most significant modern tests. <\/span>Critics argue that the controversy surrounding Trump’s cryptocurrency empire is rooted not in the scale of his wealth but in the relationship between his financial interests and his administration’s policies.<\/span><\/p>\n

During the 2024 presidential campaign, Trump promised to make the United States the “Crypto Capital of the World.”<\/strong> After returning to office, his administration embraced one of the most crypto-friendly policy agendas in recent American history. It signaled regulatory reforms, encouraged blockchain innovation, and sought to establish a more predictable environment for digital finance. The response from financial markets was immediate.<\/span><\/p>\n

Investor confidence strengthened. Institutional investment increased. Cryptocurrency prices surged. Blockchain companies welcomed what many regarded as a fundamental shift in Washington’s approach to digital assets. Critics contend that those same policies also enhanced the value of businesses closely linked to the President and his family.<\/span><\/p>\n

“The issue is not whether Donald Trump should own cryptocurrency. The issue is whether government policy can remain impartial when the President’s financial interests rise alongside the industry he is promoting.”<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Much of that scrutiny has focused on World Liberty Financial<\/strong> and the $TRUMP meme coin<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Market analysts have observed that White House announcements, regulatory signals, and even Trump’s public remarks have repeatedly influenced investor sentiment surrounding these ventures. Whether intentional or incidental, those developments have fueled concerns that presidential authority and private commercial interests are becoming increasingly intertwined. Trump rejects those allegations outright.<\/span><\/p>\n

He maintains that professional managers oversee his investments and that he exercises no day-to-day control over his financial holdings. He also notes that he built his fortune long before entering politics, arguing that successful entrepreneurs should not be penalized simply because they later choose public service. His supporters make an even broader case.<\/span><\/p>\n

They argue that Trump’s business background gives him a practical understanding of markets, investment, and innovation that career politicians often lack. From their perspective, policies supporting blockchain technology and digital finance are designed to strengthen America’s global competitiveness rather than enrich the President personally. Ethics experts remain unconvinced. Their concern extends beyond whether any laws have been violated.<\/span><\/p>\n

Democratic government depends not only on legality but also on institutional credibility. Even when public officials act within the law, circumstances that create the appearance of preferential treatment can gradually weaken confidence in government. Cryptocurrency markets amplify that concern.<\/span><\/p>\n

Unlike traditional industries, digital asset markets react almost instantly to political developments. Regulatory announcements, executive orders, congressional initiatives, and presidential statements can move billions of dollars within hours. When the President himself has significant financial exposure to those markets, even indirect policy effects inevitably attract intense public scrutiny. The controversy has also revived broader questions surrounding Trump’s business interests.<\/span><\/p>\n

During his first term, ethics watchdogs questioned foreign government spending at Trump-owned hotels, international licensing agreements bearing the Trump name, and commercial relationships involving overseas partners. More recently, debate surrounding Qatar’s proposed gift of a luxury aircraft to the United States renewed concerns about presidential ethics, transparency, and accountability. Each controversy has differed in substance.\u00a0<\/span>Each has nevertheless pointed toward the same fundamental question. <\/span>Where should a democracy draw the line between public office and private enterprise? <\/strong>The White House has consistently rejected allegations of any ethical impropriety.<\/span><\/p>\n

Administration officials insist that Trump’s cryptocurrency agenda is driven by America’s long-term economic interests rather than his personal financial position. They argue that strengthening the nation’s leadership in blockchain technology, digital finance, and stablecoins is essential if the United States is to remain competitive in the global economy. That strategic argument deserves serious consideration. <\/span>Cryptocurrency is no longer simply another investment class. It has become an emerging financial technology with significant implications for economic growth, technological leadership, and national competitiveness.<\/span><\/p>\n

“The race for leadership in digital finance may prove as consequential in the twenty-first century as the race for technological leadership was during the internet revolution.”<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This broader geopolitical context often receives less attention than the domestic political controversy. Yet it may ultimately prove more significant. <\/span>The United States and China are no longer competing only in manufacturing, artificial intelligence, or military capability. Increasingly, they are competing to shape the rules governing the next generation of global finance.<\/span><\/p>\n

China has aggressively advanced its digital yuan (e-CNY)<\/strong>, promoting a government-controlled model of digital finance while maintaining strict restrictions on private cryptocurrency markets. The United States has largely pursued the opposite strategy, encouraging private-sector innovation through blockchain technology, stablecoins, tokenized assets, and decentralized financial platforms. From this perspective, Trump’s embrace of cryptocurrency extends beyond personal business interests. It also aligns with a broader American effort to preserve leadership in the rapidly evolving global financial system. That strategic rationale, however, does not eliminate ethical concerns. If anything, it makes them even more important.<\/span><\/p>\n

The closer public policy aligns with a President’s private financial interests, the greater the responsibility to demonstrate transparency, accountability, and institutional integrity. The debate surrounding Trump’s cryptocurrency empire therefore reaches far beyond digital assets.\u00a0<\/span>It has become one of the earliest and most consequential tests of how democratic institutions respond when political authority, technological innovation, and unprecedented private wealth converge in a single presidency.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Future of Democracy<\/strong><\/p>\n

The controversy surrounding Donald Trump’s cryptocurrency empire is no longer simply a story about personal wealth. It reflects a much broader transformation in the global economy, one in which political influence, technological innovation, and private capital are becoming increasingly interconnected.<\/span><\/p>\n

For much of the twentieth century, economic power was measured by ownership of factories, oil fields, railroads, and real estate. Over the past two decades, however, the world’s most valuable companies have emerged from technology, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and digital platforms. Cryptocurrency represents the latest phase of that evolution, shifting wealth creation from physical assets to decentralized digital networks.<\/span><\/p>\n

Viewed in that context, Trump’s extraordinary crypto earnings represent more than a successful business venture. They illustrate how political influence and digital finance are becoming increasingly intertwined in the twenty-first century. The implications extend well beyond ethics and domestic politics.<\/span><\/p>\n

Cryptocurrency has rapidly evolved into an instrument of geopolitical competition. Just as the US dollar underpinned American financial leadership throughout the twentieth century, blockchain technology, stable coins, and digital assets are increasingly expected to shape the architecture of tomorrow’s global financial system. The contest is no longer confined to Silicon Valley or Wall Street. It has become a strategic rivalry between Washington and Beijing over who will define the future of digital finance.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

China has invested heavily in its digital yuan (e-CNY)<\/strong>, advancing a government-controlled model of digital finance while maintaining strict limits on private cryptocurrency markets. The United States has largely chosen the opposite path, encouraging innovation through private blockchain companies, stable coins, decentralized finance, and cryptocurrency markets. The objective extends beyond technological leadership.<\/span><\/p>\n

Washington increasingly views digital finance as an extension of its global economic influence. Preserving American leadership in financial innovation may prove as important in the twenty-first century as maintaining the dominance of the US dollar was during the twentieth.<\/span><\/p>\n

“The competition is no longer simply over currencies. It is about who will shape the architecture of tomorrow’s global financial system.”<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

From that perspective, Trump’s embrace of cryptocurrency reflects more than personal financial interests. It also aligns with a broader American strategy to preserve technological and financial leadership in an increasingly digital world. Yet geopolitical strategy alone cannot resolve the ethical questions surrounding the President’s personal financial interests. The central issue remains unchanged. <\/span>Can citizens maintain confidence in democratic institutions when government policy and a President’s private financial interests appear to advance together?<\/strong> Modern democracies depend on far more than constitutional safeguards. They depend on institutional credibility.<\/span><\/p>\n

History shows that American presidents have repeatedly faced intense scrutiny whenever personal financial interests intersected with public office. The Watergate<\/strong> scandal fundamentally reshaped expectations of presidential accountability. In its aftermath, financial disclosure requirements became more rigorous, while ethical oversight assumed a more prominent role in public life. President Jimmy Carter<\/strong>, for example, placed his family’s peanut business into a blind trust to eliminate even the appearance of a conflict of interest. Successive presidents have generally sought to maintain a clear separation between public office and private enterprise, recognizing that democratic legitimacy depends as much on public perception as it does on legal compliance. Trump has chosen a different course.<\/span><\/p>\n

Although he maintains that independent managers oversee his financial holdings, he has never fully separated his commercial identity from his political brand. That distinction matters because the Trump name functions simultaneously as a political asset and a commercial brand. Presidential announcements, regulatory initiatives, and policy statements now have the potential to influence markets connected to businesses that bear the President’s own name. Such circumstances present challenges unlike those faced by previous administrations.<\/span><\/p>\n

Unlike traditional industries, cryptocurrency markets react almost instantly to political developments. Executive orders, regulatory decisions, congressional initiatives, and even presidential remarks can move billions of dollars within hours. In such an environment, the boundary between governance and financial markets becomes increasingly difficult to define.<\/span><\/p>\n

“The digital economy has created ethical questions that twentieth-century democratic institutions were never designed to answer.”<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The debate unfolding in Washington carries important implications far beyond the United States.<\/span><\/p>\n

India, too, faces the challenge of encouraging financial innovation while preserving regulatory certainty, market stability, and public confidence in emerging financial technologies. Although New Delhi has not granted cryptocurrencies full legal status, it has established a taxation framework while simultaneously advancing the Digital Rupee (CBDC)<\/strong> under the leadership of the Reserve Bank of India<\/strong>. India’s objective is to foster innovation without compromising monetary stability, consumer protection, or financial oversight. The American experience offers a valuable lesson for India.<\/span><\/p>\n

Technological leadership alone is insufficient. Strong institutions, transparent regulation, and credible governance are equally essential if digital financial markets are to earn lasting public trust. Cryptocurrency remains one of the most debated financial innovations of the modern era. Its supporters see it as the future of global finance. Its critics continue to regard it as a highly speculative asset vulnerable to manipulation, volatility, and regulatory uncertainty.<\/span><\/p>\n

Regardless of which perspective ultimately prevails, one conclusion is becoming increasingly difficult to dispute. Cryptocurrency is no longer merely an investment class. It has become an integral part of economic strategy, technological competition, and geopolitical influence.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ultimately, the Trump crypto controversy is not merely about blockchain technology, meme coins, or billion-dollar fortunes. It is about whether democratic institutions can adapt to an economy in which political authority, technological innovation, and private capital increasingly reinforce one another.<\/span><\/p>\n

Tomorrow, the debate may no longer center on cryptocurrency. Artificial intelligence, quantum computing, biotechnology, and other emerging technologies could create even greater concentrations of wealth and influence. The technologies will change. The ethical challenge will remain. <\/span><\/p>\n

One democratic principle, however, cannot change: public office must always serve the public interest before private enterprise. The strength of democratic governance in the digital age will ultimately depend on preserving that distinction.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a9 Sanjeev Oak<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

President Trump’s disclosure that his family’s cryptocurrency ventures generated more than$1 billion in a single year has ignited one of<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":6739,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_container_layout":"default_layout","colormag_page_sidebar_layout":"default_layout","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"css_class_manager_body_classes":"","css_class_manager_use_in_post_loop":false},"categories":[3],"tags":[630,154,184,632,631],"class_list":["post-6745","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-economy","tag-crypto","tag-rbi","tag-trump","tag-us-economy","tag-white-house"],"gutentor_comment":0,"magazineBlocksPostFeaturedMedia":{"thumbnail":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1","medium":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?fit=300%2C169&ssl=1","medium_large":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?fit=768%2C432&ssl=1","large":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?fit=800%2C450&ssl=1","1536x1536":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?fit=1536%2C864&ssl=1","2048x2048":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?fit=1920%2C1080&ssl=1","colormag-highlighted-post":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?resize=392%2C272&ssl=1","colormag-featured-post-medium":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?resize=390%2C205&ssl=1","colormag-featured-post-small":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?resize=130%2C90&ssl=1","colormag-featured-image":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?resize=800%2C445&ssl=1","colormag-default-news":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1","colormag-featured-image-large":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?resize=1400%2C600&ssl=1","colormag-elementor-block-extra-large-thumbnail":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?resize=1155%2C480&ssl=1","colormag-elementor-grid-large-thumbnail":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?resize=600%2C417&ssl=1","colormag-elementor-grid-small-thumbnail":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?resize=285%2C450&ssl=1","colormag-elementor-grid-medium-large-thumbnail":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?resize=575%2C198&ssl=1","sow-carousel-default":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?resize=272%2C182&ssl=1","sow-post-carousel-overlay-theme":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?resize=360%2C476&ssl=1","sow-post-carousel-cards-theme":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?resize=360%2C240&ssl=1","sow-blog-portfolio":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?resize=375%2C375&ssl=1","sow-blog-grid":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?resize=720%2C480&ssl=1","sow-blog-alternate":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?resize=950%2C630&ssl=1"},"magazineBlocksPostAuthor":{"name":"admin","avatar":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/907e2ea9c770f6faa637f8ea68c71753beae518b717dc7c49df834cd7acded64?s=96&d=mm&r=g"},"magazineBlocksPostCommentsNumber":"0","magazineBlocksPostExcerpt":"President Trump’s disclosure that his family’s cryptocurrency ventures generated more than$1 billion in a single year has ignited one of","magazineBlocksPostCategories":["Economy"],"magazineBlocksPostViewCount":43,"magazineBlocksPostReadTime":14,"magazine_blocks_featured_image_url":{"full":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?fit=1920%2C1080&ssl=1",1920,1080,false],"medium":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?fit=300%2C169&ssl=1",300,169,true],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1",150,150,true]},"magazine_blocks_author":{"display_name":"admin","author_link":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/author\/admin\/"},"magazine_blocks_comment":0,"magazine_blocks_author_image":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/907e2ea9c770f6faa637f8ea68c71753beae518b717dc7c49df834cd7acded64?s=96&d=mm&r=g","magazine_blocks_category":"Economy<\/a>","jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/crypto_and_trump-1.jpg?fit=1920%2C1080&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6745","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6745"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6745\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6749,"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6745\/revisions\/6749"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6745"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6745"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bharatnewsanalysis.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6745"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}